home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990
/
1990 Time Magazine Compact Almanac, The (1991)(Time).iso
/
time
/
caps
/
60s
/
60sex
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-10-22
|
3KB
|
63 lines
The Sexual Revolution
[Americans discovered that the freedom from fear of unwanted
pregnancy that was the gift of "the pill" went hand in hand with
other kinds of sexual freedom.]
(January 24, 1964)
Men with memories ask, "What, again?" The first sexual revolution
followed World War I, when flaming youth buried the Victorian era and
anointed itself as the Jazz Age. In many ways it was an innocent
revolution. In This Side of Paradise, F. Scott Fitzgerald alarmed
mothers by telling them "how casually their daughters were accustomed
to being kissed"; today mothers thank their stars if kissing is all
their daughters are accustomed to.
The rebels of the '60s have parents with only the tattered remnants
of a code. Adrift in a sea of permissiveness, they have little to
rebel against. Parents, educators and the guardians of morality at
large do pull themselves together to say "don't," but they usually
sound halfhearted. Closed minds have not disappeared, but as a
society, the U.S. seems to be dominated by what Congregationalist
Minister and Educator Robert Elliot Fitch calls an "orgy of
open-mindedness." Faith and principle are far from dead--but what
stands out is an often desperate search for "new standards for a new
age."
Publicly and dramatically, the change is evident in Spectator
Sex--what may be seen and read. It remains for each man and woman to
walk through this sexual bombardment and determine for themselves what
to them seems tasteless or objectionable, entertaining or merely dull.
A healthy society must assume a certain degree of immunity on the part
of its people. But no one can really calculate the effect this
exposure is having on individual lives and minds. Above all, it is not
an isolated phenomenon. It is part and symptom of an era in which
morals are widely held to be both private and relative, in which
pleasure is increasingly considered an almost constitutional right
rather than a privilege, in which self-denial in increasingly seen as
foolishness rather than virtue.
(April 7, 1967)
"The pill" is a miraculous tablet that contains as little as one
thirty-thousandth of an ounce of chemical. It costs 1 1/4 cents to
manufacture; a month's supply now sells for $2.00 retail. It is little
more trouble to take on schedule than a daily vitamin. Yet in a mere
six years it has changed and liberated the sex and family life of a
large and still growing segment of the U.S. population. Of the 39
million American women capable of motherhood, 7,000,000 have already
taken the pills; some 5,700,000 are on them now.
Does the convenient contraceptive promote promiscuity? In some
cases, no doubt it does--as did the automobile, the drive-in movies
and the motel. But the consensus among both physicians and sociologist
is that a girl who is promiscuous on the pill would have been
promiscuous without it. The more mature of the unmarried in the Now
Generation say that, far from promoting promiscuity, the pills impose
a sense of responsibility. Formerly, many a young woman rejected
premarital relations specifically because of her fear of pregnancy.
Now, on the pills, she has to make the decision according to her own
conscience.